Cyber deception has emerged as a promising strategy for deterring adversaries in the digital domain. By leveraging principles from cyberpsychology, organizations can create convincing deceptive environments that manipulate attackers' perceptions, decision-making processes, and behaviors. This psychological approach to cyber deterrence offers a proactive means of defending against advanced threats and reducing the risk of successful attacks.
Cyberpsychology plays a crucial role in the design and implementation of effective cyber deception strategies. By understanding the cognitive biases, motivations, and decision-making processes of attackers, defenders can craft deceptive measures that exploit these psychological vulnerabilities (Aggarwal et al., 2019). For example, the use of honeypots and decoys can create a false sense of success for attackers, leading them to waste time and resources on unproductive actions (Ferguson-Walter et al., 2019). Similarly, the strategic placement of deceptive cues and misinformation can manipulate attackers' perceptions of the attack surface, causing them to make suboptimal decisions and expose their tradecraft, and tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) (Pawlick & Zhu, 2021).
The psychological impact of cyber deception, machine or human, extends beyond the immediate interaction between attackers and deceptive assets. By creating an environment of uncertainty and mistrust, cyber deception can deter future attacks by increasing the perceived risk and cost of targeting the organization (Taddeo & Floridi, 2018). Attackers who have been repeatedly deceived or who have experienced the frustration of wasted efforts may be less likely to launch further attacks or may redirect their attention to easier targets (Fraunholz et al., 2018). Moreover, the strategic use of attribution and signaling in cyber deception can create a credible threat of retaliation or legal action, further deterring malicious actors (Stech & Heckman, 2018).
The integration of cyber deception and cyberpsychology offers a powerful approach to deterring advanced cyber threats. By exploiting the psychological vulnerabilities of attackers and creating an environment of uncertainty and mistrust, organizations can proactively defend their networks and reduce the risk of successful attacks. As the cyber threat landscape continues to evolve, the development and application of psychologically-informed deception strategies will be essential for maintaining a robust deterrence posture in the digital domain.
References:
Aggarwal, P., Gonzalez, C., & Dutt, V. (2019). Cyber-security: Role of deception in cyber-attack detection. Advances in Human Factors in Cybersecurity, 85-96.
Ferguson-Walter, K., Shade, T., Rogers, A., Trumbo, M. C. S., Nauer, K. S., Divis, K. M., Jones, A., Combs, A., & Abbott, R. G. (2019). The Tularosa study: An experimental design and implementation to quantify the effectiveness of cyber deception. Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Fraunholz, D., Anton, S. D., Lipps, C., Reti, D., Krohmer, D., Pohl, F., Tammen, M., & Schotten, H. (2018). Demystifying deception technology: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06196.
Pawlick, J., & Zhu, Q. (2021). A game-theoretic taxonomy and survey of defensive deception for cybersecurity and privacy. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(4), 1-28.
Stech, F. J., & Heckman, K. E. (2018). Human factors in cyber deception. In Cyber deception (pp. 265-284). Springer, Cham.
Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Regulate artificial intelligence to avert cyber arms race. Nature, 556(7701), 296-298.
__