· 2 min read

AI Adversary Engagement in Cybersecurity: A New Paradigm for Proactive Defense

AI Adversary Engagement in Cybersecurity: A New Paradigm for Proactive Defense
AI Adversary Engagement by Phil Dursey and leonardo.ai, the AI Security Pro human-machine (rendering) team 

The emergence of AI-driven cyber adversaries has brought about a new challenge in the realm of cybersecurity. These adversaries leverage AI and machine learning to automate and optimize their attacks, adapting to defenses, discovering vulnerabilities, and launching sophisticated, targeted attacks at scale¹,². Traditional passive defense strategies struggle to keep pace with the speed and adaptability of these AI-driven threats, necessitating a shift towards more proactive approaches. This is where AI adversary engagement comes into play, offering a new paradigm for active defense.

AI adversary engagement involves actively interacting with adversaries using AI-driven techniques to gather intelligence, disrupt attacks, and improve overall defense by learning from adversarial behavior. This approach encompasses various techniques, such as AI-powered deception using adaptive honeypots and decoys to lure adversaries and gather intelligence on their tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs)³. Another technique is adversarial perturbation, which introduces carefully crafted perturbations to the adversary's input data to disrupt their AI models and lead to incorrect decisions⁴. Adversarial reinforcement learning can also be employed to model and predict adversarial behavior, helping optimize defensive strategies⁵.

The benefits of AI adversary engagement are significant. By engaging adversaries proactively, defenders can disrupt attacks before they cause significant damage⁶. This interaction also generates valuable threat intelligence, providing insights into adversarial TTPs that can inform and enhance defensive measures⁷. Moreover, AI adversary engagement enables defenses to continuously learn and adapt based on adversarial behavior, allowing them to stay ahead of evolving threats.

Looking ahead, the future of AI adversary engagement is promising. Integrating this approach with proactive threat hunting can enhance the identification and neutralization of threats. Sharing AI adversary engagement insights across organizations can foster collaborative defense and improve collective resilience against advanced threats. The development of explainable AI techniques for adversary engagement can help build trust and facilitate human-machine collaboration in cybersecurity⁹.

AI adversary engagement represents a new paradigm for proactive defense in the face of AI-driven cyber threats. By actively engaging with adversaries using AI-driven techniques, defenders can gather valuable intelligence, disrupt attacks, and adapt to evolving threats. While challenges remain, the potential benefits of this approach make it a crucial area of focus for the future of cybersecurity.


References:

1. Kaloudi, N., & Li, J. (2020). The AI-Based Cyber Threat Landscape: A Survey. ACM Computing Surveys, 53(1), 1-34.

2. Brundage, M., Avin, S., Clark, J., Toner, H., Eckersley, P., Garfinkel, B., ... & Amodei, D. (2018). The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.07228.

3. Fraunholz, D., Anton, S. D., Lipps, C., Reti, D., Krohmer, D., Pohl, F., ... & Schotten, H. D. (2018). Demystifying Deception Technology: A Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.06196.

4. Lin, Z., Shi, Y., & Xue, Z. (2019). IDSGAN: Generative Adversarial Networks for Attack Generation against Intrusion Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.02077.

5. Ceker, H., & Upadhyaya, S. (2017, May). Adaptive Techniques for Stealthy Adversarial Attacks Against Deep Reinforcement Learning. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) (pp. 2397-2401). IEEE.

6. Fugate, S., & Ferguson-Walter, K. (2019). Artificial Intelligence and Game Theory Models for Defending Against Social Engineering Attacks. AI Magazine, 40(1), 31-43.

7. Chakraborty, T., Pierazzi, F., & Subrahmanian, V. S. (2020). EC2: Ensemble Clustering and Classification for Predicting Unhandled Threats in Cybersecurity. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing.

8. Payne, B. R., & Abegaz, T. T. (2021). Securing cyber-physical systems with adversarial reinforcement learning. Discover Internet of Things, 1(1), 1-19.

9. Wirkuttis, N., & Klein, H. (2017). Artificial intelligence in cybersecurity. Cyber, Intelligence, and Security, 1(1), 103-119.

__